- Stela
of
Queen
Amanishakheto
and
the
goddess
Amesemi
carved
from
Sandstone.
From
Temple
of
Arum
at
Naga,
late
first
century
BC.
-
- The
front
of
this
round-topped
small
stela,
found
between
the
fallen
columns
of
the
hypostyle
hall
in
the
Temple
of
Arum
at
Naga
is
decorated
in
sunk
relief
of
high
technical
and
artistic
quality
lender
the
winged
sun-disc
filling
the
upper
fourth
of
the
stela
two
female
figures
are
represented
facing
each
other.
Both
are
wearing
a
close-fitting
dress
descending
to
the
feet
a
fringed
scarf
over
the
right
shoulder,
a
broad
collar
and
a
round
curled
wig.
Otherwise
they
are
represented
in
very
different
ways.
The
left
figure
has
a
slim
elegant
body;
the
dress
shows
a
title
pattern
of
diagonal
stripes
and
dotted
lines.
A
chin-band,
an
earring,
an
ornamented
diadem
with
Uraeus
and
a
crown
consisting
of
a
pair
of
falcons
with
sun-discs
sitting
on
a
crescent
contrast
with
the
pleated
dress
and
the
simple
diadem
of
the
extremely
corpulent
woman
on
the
right.
- The
inscriptions
in
Meroitic
hieroglyphs
identify
the
left
figure
as
Amesemi,
the
divine
consort
of
the
lion
god
Apedemak
(the
first
complete
reference
to
this
name)
and
the
figure
to
the
right
as
Amanishakheto
(with
out
cartouche),
the
well-known
Meroitic
queen
buried
in
Pyramid
N6
at
Begrawiya.
- The
goddess
plays
the
active
part:
her
right
hand
supports
the
elbow
of
the
queen's
right
arm.
raised
in
adoration
of
Amesemi;
her
left
arm
passes
behind
the
queen.
the
left
hand
supports
the
neck
of
the
queen
and
a
clotted
line
starting
at
the
tip
of
the
forefinger,
surrounds
the
head
of
the
queen
to
her
forehead.
A
chain
consisting
of
tiny
ankh
signs
extends
from
Amesemi's
nose
to
the
nose
of
Amanishakheto.
This
animation
by
the
divine
breath
is
illustrated
in
a
similar
way
in
the
reliefs
of
the
Lion
Temple
at
Naga.
- The
rear
and
the
sides
of
the
stela
have
fifteen
lines
of
text
in
cursive
Meroitic,
topped
on
the
rear
by
a
line
in
Egyptian
hieroglyphs
without
specific
meaning.
In
his
still
unpublished
analysis
of
the
Meroitic
text
Claude
Rilly
concedes
a
'feeling
of
frustration'
of
the
philologist
in
front
of
such
a
well-preserved
inscription
but
he
succeeds
at
least
in
defining
the
character
of
the
text
as
a
religious
hymn.
|